Linguistic Analysis of Pleonasm Used in English
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69760/jales.2026001002Keywords:
pleonasm, redundancy, corpus linguistics, English language, pragmatics, stylistics, register variation, discourse analysisAbstract
Pleonasm, defined as the use of redundant or superfluous words, is a pervasive feature in both spoken and written English. Traditionally regarded as a stylistic fault or error, pleonasm actually serves a range of communicative, pragmatic, and rhetorical functions. This study conducts a comprehensive corpus-based linguistic analysis of pleonasm, examining its frequency, syntactic patterns, and functional roles across multiple registers including spoken language, fiction, academic writing, and news discourse. Data drawn from the British National Corpus (BNC) and the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) reveal that pleonasm is most prevalent in informal and creative contexts, where it often enhances emphasis, clarity, and stylistic rhythm. The findings challenge prescriptive notions that redundancy is inherently undesirable, highlighting pleonasm’s role in effective communication and language evolution. Implications for language teaching, editing, and stylistics are discussed, underscoring the importance of pragmatic awareness in language use.
References
Alisoy, H. (2025). Stylistic Analysis of Donald Trump’s Inaugural Speech: Lexical, Syntactic, and Rhetorical Features. Acta Globalis Humanitatis Et Linguarum, 2(3), 9-19.
Alisoy, H. (2025). Cohesion, Persuasion, and Ideology: The Pragmatic Functions of Repetition in Trump’s Rhetoric. Porta Universorum, 1(3), 80-86.
Aslanova, U. (2015). ZUR NEGO-POSITIVE VARIATION VON PHRASEOLOGISCHEN EUPHEMISMEN IM DEUTSCHEN UND IM ASERBAIDSCHANISCHEN. In Иностранные языки в современном мире: состояние и тенденции развития системы оценивания в образовании (pp. 16-22).
Aston, G., & Burnard, L. (1998). The BNC handbook: Exploring the British National Corpus with SARA. Edinburgh University Press.
BABAYEV, J. (2023). UOT: 811 EXPRESSIVE MEANS FORMED OUT OF MISTAKES: ANACOLUTHON, MALAPROPISM, CATACHRESIS. ELMİ ƏSƏRLƏR, (1).
Babayev, J. (2022). STYLISTIC OPPRTUNITIES OF TONGUE TWISTERS. Sciences of Europe, (90-2), 59-61.
Biber, D. (2006). Register variation and corpus studies. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook (pp. 575–601). Mouton de Gruyter.
Crystal, D. (2008). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (6th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Davies, M. (2008). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 520 million words, 1990-present. Available at https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). Academic Press.
Ismayil, Z. (2025). Stylistic Functions of Auxiliary Parts of Speech in Folklore Language. Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum, 2(4), 332-344.
Ismayil, Z. (2021). DERIVATOLOGICAL PROBLEMS IN DIALECTIC AND ACCENTS OF NAKHCHIVAN. Linguistic Researches, (2).
Lakoff, R. (1973). The logic of politeness; or, minding your p's and q's. Papers from the 9th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 292–305.
Pinker, S. (2014). The sense of style: The thinking person’s guide to writing in the 21st century. Viking.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman.
Tannen, D. (1989). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge University Press.
Ulduz Boyukkishi, A. (2022). Semantic classification of negative phraseological units in the German and Azerbaijani languages and their negative affirmative transformation. Conrado, 18(85), 128-135.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Azerbaijan Language and Education Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
